Can You Sue For Food Poisoning?
Food poisoning is a foodborne illness that occurs when you eat or drink items that aren't prepared correctly or are prepared with infected ingredients. The results of food poisoning can range from inconvenient and unpleasant gastric distress to serious complications that require hospitalization.
The potential for serious injuries leads some people to wonder whether they can sue for food poisoning.
You can file a personal injury lawsuit for food poisoning. Whether the case is successful depends, in part, on your ability to prove that you did suffer from food poisoning, that you suffered damages due to those injuries and that someone else was at fault or negligent in creating the situation. A food poisoning lawyer can help you understand how strong your case is and what your steps to seeking compensation might look like.
Yes, you can sue for food poisoning if you believe a restaurant caused it. Understanding how to sue a restaurant for food poisoning requires speaking to a food poisoning attorney.
Likewise, you can sue a grocery store for food poisoning. In fact, you can sue any business or company that handles or prepares food or beverages that you ingested if you believe those items to be at fault for your food poisoning. It's important to note that bringing a lawsuit for food poisoning doesn't necessarily mean you'll win the case or receive any type of compensation.
You'll need to take numerous steps to support a chance at a successful outcome with a food poisoning lawsuit. The first is a diagnosis of food poisoning. An official diagnosis typically comes after a medical professional takes a stool sample or other sample to verify the presence of something making you sick. Without this step, you may simply be basing your claim on the fact that you feel unwell, and that isn't a strong case.
Next, you'll need to build a case that a specific food — from a specific restaurant, grocery store or other business — made you sick. This is more difficult than proving you had some sort of food poisoning in the first place because you may not realize you're sick until hours or even a day or more later. You could have eaten other things since then, and it can be hard to pinpoint the origin of your illness.
One way lawyers work to pinpoint food poisoning origin is through circumstantial evidence. If your attorney can build a large enough body of evidence, you may have a strong case.
An example of the type of evidence that can help prove that food poisoning came from a specific restaurant is the fact that other diners who ate there at the same time or who had the same dish also became sick. Attorneys may also subpoena evidence and witnesses. They might, for example, look at food storage records to determine if a case can be made that a restaurant wasn't storing ingredients at an appropriate temperature or call witnesses from a commercial kitchen to testify about how food was managed.
More Related Articles:
- When Do You Need a Lawyer? Determine If You Need to Hire an Attorney
- What Is a Class-Action Lawsuit?
- What Is a Misdemeanor?
- What to Do After a Car Accident
- What Is Power of Attorney?
Settlements in food poisoning lawsuits range widely. Some people are compensated a few thousand dollars to cover medical bills, for example, while others might end up with tens or hundreds of thousands in compensation.
The total amount of a settlement depends on factors such as how severe the injuries and losses were and the strength of the case that can be made against a specific business or party. For example, if someone suffers food poisoning that's so severe they're hospitalized for many days and can't work for months, they have more damages to claim than someone who experienced an overnight stay in the hospital and was out of work for a week.
One of the best ways to understand the type of compensation you might be able to seek after experiencing food poisoning is to talk to a lawyer who's experienced in food poisoning cases.
Elocal Editorial Content is for educational and entertainment purposes only. The information provided on this site is not legal advice, and no attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by use of the Editorial Content. We are not a law firm or a substitute for an attorney or law firm. We cannot provide advice, explanation, opinion, or recommendation about possible legal rights, remedies, defenses, options or strategies. The opinions, beliefs and viewpoints expressed by the eLocal Editorial Team and other third-party content providers do not necessarily reflect the opinions, beliefs and viewpoints of eLocal or its affiliate companies. Use of the Blog is subject to theWebsite Terms and Conditions.
The eLocal Editorial Team operates independently of eLocal USA's marketing and sales decisions.